The Pixies will always win over Nirvana for their complete no-fucks-given attitude to the music industry. Most people think grunge is heavy, therefore it must be dirty and loose (like the Stooges or the Stones). Nirvana proved this wrong, because they were one tight, ‘in the pocket’ band in the studio, and that’s part of why they became commercially successful. The Pixies, on the other hand, are completely manic both in the studio and live, and this is why they were less successful and incidentally (or not) a better rock ‘n’ roll band.
Doolittle, their second record, starts off with a punk bass line, until the band’s fuzzy guitar cacophony breaks out of its cell. Then proceeds some sublime thrashing on top of which Black Francis shouts about a Luis Buñuel art house movie he once saw. If the listener weren’t aware of the high artsy regard the works of Luis Buñuel were held in, he might think ‘slicin’ up eyeballs/ooh ahh ahh oahh” was some violent fantasy from a thrash metal song. They follow in the Lou Reed school of blending avant-garde art with rock ‘n’ roll; poetry with urban dirt; literary modernism with rough guitar, etc. They are cultured wackos then, like the New York Dolls, Iggy Pop and various other well-read sleazoids. They’re not snobs, though: bassist Kim Deal joined the band after answering an advert in the Boston Phoenix requesting a bassist who liked both Hüsker Dü and Peter, Paul and Mary in equal measure. They’re even weirder, though because Black Francis doesn’t peddle the usual sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll ambiguity: he prefers to talk about boxcars and other assorted things of brilliant mundanity. I like that.
Anyway, the best moments on Doolittle will make you effervesce in awe of its sheer ragged glory, and flail yourself within an inch of your sanity. Good rock music, then.
7.5 Ethereal Monkeys out of 10
Here’s ‘Here Comes Your Man’, which should answer your the question that I know has been troubling you since I mentioned it: What happens when you mix Hüsker Dü and Peter, Paul and Mary?…
Johnny Rotten sang over and dominated the Sex Pistols with his political anger, his grand anarchist intentions squashing the fun. What they didn’t get was that rock ‘n’ roll’s primary intention should be to entertain rather than shock, which is secondary in my view. Sometimes it means having a good old moan about career opportunities, (as the Clash do on this seminal debut from 1977: ‘I don’t wanna make tea at the BBC!’) as opposed to referencing Nazi imagery (jackboots and all) which seems both iffy and desperate.
I’ve always admired the Clash because, under the whole ‘punk revolution against classic rock’ and their more political leanings, there lies within them a great respect for the timeless culture of rock ‘n’ roll and its inherently tongue-in-cheek humour. Whereas the Sex Pistols whined about the Berlin Wall with angst, The Clash’s grinning portraits of London’s sleazoids are more reminiscent of Lou Reed’s nonchalant dossiers of New York androgyny, or the Stones’ casual vice. I don’t mean to glamorize any of this, and I intend to stear the f*ck clear of that lifestyle. However; Punk’s disregard for history can be pretty childish, and I get the sense that this band balances both being brash and loud (qualifying them as a punk band) as well as a certain self-deprecation, thus entering them into the pantheon of great rock ‘n’ roll bands. Don’t get me started about Sandinista, though.
9 Protex Blues out of 10
''Makes some men crazy and then they act like fools
Makes some men crazy, and then they start to drool
It's a crass and raucous crackass place
It's a plague upon the the human race
It's a terrible illness, it's a terrible case
And it's usually permanent when it takes place''
- Little Feat
There’s a unique sensation that really loud, evil rock ‘n’ roll gives you. I believe the truly great rock ‘n’ roll will give you something similar to a shot of adrenaline that almost tips you over the edge; an ignition of something in your body that is joyously primal, and ignorant and far away from the stiff science of your brain, or a sweaty, glorious ‘f*ck off’ to anything and everything. Here’s the first of three records in a series that give me that release and them some: The New York Dolls’ 1973 debut album.
This kind of music, unlike how many romantic journalists make it out to be, was not some virtuous reaction to ‘classic rock’s excesses’ (see the life and times of Iggy Pop for proof). It was a reaction to their beloved rock ‘n’ roll culture becoming the ownership of California softies like Jackson Browne and the Eagles (see Barney Hoskyns’ book ‘Hotel California for the dirt). In other words: sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll had gone from being the ideology of angsty youths to being the secretive excesses of the 30-something year-olds who wrote ‘You Make Loving Fun’. The New York Dolls were not ‘punk’, because punk is primarily political: England’s punk revolution was not sparked by disgust at Fleetwood Mac, but by The Winter of Discontent, unemployment levels, Margaret Thatcher, and so on. This album is rock music but played with the levels of speed and energy normally expected of punk. That don’t make it proto-punk, though.
I imagine these Manhattan brats were actually reasonably intellectual once the lipstick was off (lead singer David Johansen later formed a lounge jazz/calypso band…). That doesn’t matter: In performance, they take sleaze to levels the Stones had bad trips about. Acting like Jerry Lee Lewis is one thing, but dressing up as Jerry Lee Lewis’ most perverted nightmare is pure rock ‘n’ roll in its most wicked, urban form, and I love it.
Next time: The Clash’s 1977 debut cracker. Here’s a taster: